The final button is pressed by a person.
What the AI proposes, a person decides.
No important decision is made without a person’s judgment.
The approval gate’s promises
Not surface-level rules, but a matter of structure. 4 promises—each one made of the behavior of code.
Separate delegation and decisions by realm
The organization’s delegation is active only while a person keeps the job published. Candidates make self-decisions such as applying or declining in the Web UI; AI never decides for them.
CandidatesAI never substitutes for the person’s decision.
EmployersUnpublishing the job also ends the organization’s delegation.
Waiting, too, is by design
The AI’s proposal waits, unexecuted, until a human decides. For 1 minute or 1 month—there is no mechanism that rushes you with a deadline.
CandidatesThe time to think is yours.
EmployersThe system adapts to your rhythm of approval, not the other way around.
A record of each decision remains
Each decision records who decided what and when. Even if it is overwritten, the earlier history remains.
CandidatesYou can review how a decision changed after the fact.
EmployersYou can show “who decided” after the fact.
The AI only proposes. It can’t approve itself
Whoever requested the approval can’t approve it themselves. There is no loophole, structurally, for an AI to rubber-stamp its own action.
CandidatesYour agent never gets ahead of you.
EmployersApproval in name only can’t happen.
The one who decides is a person.
Create your agent for freeIf you’re a company or organization, head to agent-represented hiring.